|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the kick-off of Everything In Between: Gay Asian Shorts, just one cluster in the galaxy of Asian and Asian American films shown at the 25th International Lesbian & Gay Film Festival which ran June 14-24. Of 350 films and videos from 26 different countries, no less than 17 were from Asia and Asian America. Many of these filmmakers, struggling to map out these in-between realities of interpersonal and interethnic sexual cultures, also played a strong part in Framelines Persistent Vision conference of queer media makers, cultural producers and academics who convened for the first time ever last week at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts under the auspices of the Lesbian & Gay Film Festival. Critical ThinkingBoth the conference and the festival seemed all about in-betweenness. The Hello Kitty store right next door to the Metreon conference room highlighted the cultural edge of this experiential limbo. And the bounty of bisexual and global gender-bending film and video works clued us into the growing efforts of independent filmmakers, and those who love them, to burst out of the traditional and stifling boxes of Western dualistic thinking about race, gender and sexuality black/white, man/woman, gay/straight. Its a disruption of binary identities, points out Erik Sudduth, a graduate student from Ohio State University, at a workshop entitled The Trouble with Normal: Queering Identities. Boldly throwing film thinkers and makers in bed together, the Persistent Vision conference provided a three-day, raw intellectual forum for figuring out the state and future of queer media. And theres a lot of talk about going between and beyond labels to reach less-understood, yet no less real, experiences of fluid feelings, changing bodies and drifting desire. Many conference participants seem relieved they can voice their evolving understandings and misgivings about rigid categories of racial, gender and sexual identities. These terms box us in, explains Shari Frilot, programming co-director of the Outfest Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Film Festival. Lesbian/gay are political constructions, not essentialisms, and provide a point for mobilization, bringing people from the margins into a place of normalcy where we dont feel excluded. Frilot believes the original motivation for such identity-based categories had to do with being on the margins, perceived as transgressive. Now, during this less-definable, transitional stage of growing post-identity consciousness, people can celebrate transgression without having to claim identity and all the baggage that goes along with it. This may partly explain why up to 40 percent of Japanese and Korean audiences for queer films are straight women, according to filmmaker Takao Kawaguchi, at the Witnessing a New Queer Asia workshop. They want to see gay images they feel cleansed, he says. As a result, the unchallenged, uninterrupted heterosexual subject is changing, adds Hok-Sze Leung, a researcher from the University of British Columbia, and many heterosexual viewers want to watch this process unfold. With so many mainstream films showing queer content in Asia (check out the Hong Kong Movie Database at www.hkmdb.com), Leung suggests thinking in terms of a queer scape, rather than queer cinema, to describe this in-between space.
Theres a cultural bias in this country around images and stories worth watching, points out Ann Li, a communication professor at Eastern Connecticut State University. Metaphors of space help to (re)articulate. New API queer cinema attempts to reclaim and re-imagine queer Asian icons, identities and voices that chart this intermediate space(s), and changing vocabularies are springing up to help us navigate them. Tongzhi, for example, a new and trendy Chinese word for same-sex romancers, also means comrade and plays on a similar word for same, Leung throws out. And throughout the conference, one can hear queer used as a verb, as in to queer something, make it queer. In this exciting celluloid market of stimulation and emancipation, queer seems to capture the overall feeling of this strange halfway cinema house of evolutionary sexual identities and criss-crossing racial boundaries. The community is increasingly based on political affiliation, not biology or phenotype, asserts philosophy teacher Darrell Moore from Chicagos DePaul University. The difficulty is embracing and depicting this unfamiliar, barely articulated space, without erasing the political histories, commitments and solidarity that came before, Moore cautions. What is our responsibility to the past? What are the costs of abandoning it? These are some of the burning questions the queer film avant-garde asks itself as it pushes things forward, melting down categories and dissolving distinctions. Where are the new borders being drawn? Perhaps around a new love space that celebrates difference in lifestyles and individuals, without divisive social constructions, and without abandoning collective ideals. Libertarianism seems the ideology of queer cinema today, remarks film critic and cultural commentator B. Ruby Rich, as Persistent Vision draws to a close. But theres still a real sense of communitarianism.
©2001 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||